Money from nothin and they fish for free

I don’t think it should come as any surprise that I have no time for fishing. I have dealt first hand like many other rescuers of wildfowl with the aftermath of this activity and what could have been reasonably prevented. For the last twenty years myself and other rescuers in Sandwell have rescued many geese and swans across the West Midlands that have been tackled, caught up in line or have been suffering from lead poisoning. Though the source of this lead can be argued, the source of the tackle problem cannot. It comes from angling, FACT, no argument.

One should perhaps clarify that serious match anglers may well take their litter home , but casual floating day anglers are a different story.

There are some basic rules which the Environment Agency who govern rod fishing licences in the UK have published. You need a licence to fish, and this includes home made “rods” as well as professional apparatus. In addition to this you also need the permission of the land owner.

The Environment agency whilst promoting this “sport” have also in the past published a “golden rules” leaflet aimed at trying to reduce incidents of wildfowl becoming caught in tackle. It is difficult to gauge if this has had any real success, and historically  wildfowl/ angling make for awkward shared space conflict.

In March 2002, a large study undertaken in partnership with the Environment Agency , National swan convention  and the Angling trades association was published : “The impact of lost and discarded fishing line and tackle on mute swans  Research and development technical record W1-051/TR,  Perrins, Martin, Broughton”

It produced the following major observation in that it

  • “…highlighted the magnitude of the danger which angling poses for mute swans. Rescue groups and the RSPCA attend over 8,000 swans in trouble each year and it is estimated that approximately 3,000 are due to angling -related incidents, either directly hooked or entangled with fishing tackle.”

Also that year, Sandwell council announced that they were going to undertake “an angling policy”. At the time we were suspicious, as the officer in compiling this, as well as his boss and a prominent councillor  who had chaired The Leisure committee were all anglers. They also largely tried to dispute and refute incidents that we were reporting about the damage that fishing in Sandwell was causing. I was challenged to produce “evidence” by Councillor Geoff Lewis. Big mistake, for anyone who knows me.

A report looking at all areas where fishing was allowed in the borough, “An assessment of Sandwell Council’s fisheries management and its effects on wildlife and the environment” , together with recommendations was produced. We collected large amounts of tackle and fishing line from many sites across the borough and combined this with rescue statistics of birds that were injured as a direct result of angling activity- i.e that which could not be refuted.  As a matter of course, all of our rescue statistics were sent to The National Swan Convention ( an umbrella group for rescue organisations),  who collated figures for the Environment agency study and campaigning. The conclusions drawn from our report were

  • 1633 yards of fishing line was collected in just 9 months from Sandwell sites, with 1007 yards of it from Victoria Park Tipton alone!
  • multiple instances of illegal sized lead shot were collected as well as barbed and treble hooks which were supposedly “banned” on Sandwell’s pools
  • 36 birds had tackle related injuries, 14 of them pigeons
  • Little regulation and enforcement by Sandwell council with free fishing and alcohol consumption being rife
  • Fishing on non designated pools was occurring threatening wildfowl that shouldn’t have been

Above all it was noted that free fishing was a serious issue related to anti- social behaviour and litter issues and that this was a problem across Sandwell- because the council did not charge and allowed free unregulated fishing.

Scan_20151130

Discarded Line and fishing tackle from a Sandwell park

The angling policy in its first draft had to be  largely rewritten by the then parks facilities manager because it wasn’t up to scratch. Though he incorporated some of our recommendations into the policy, it was I am afraid to say a largely theoretical paper exercise. It is practice and enforcement which make the policy.

Fast forward to 2017 and it appears inevitable that I along with others are still engaged in catching birds affected by anglers. Below are a couple of examples from Sandwell this year, where free fishing continues to be allowed.

 

S7620004

S7620009

S7620006

S7620008

S7500001

…and this was a fish someone had left behind.

 

Officially Sandwell council claim that people should pay for fishing on their pools, as with any other “sporting” activity, why shouldn’t they to use the facilities? The known truth however is somewhat different. This is what is claimed on their website.

“Sandwell Council issues tickets which allows fishing at the following pools:
Dartmouth Park, West Bromwich
Swan Pool, Sandwell Valley Country Park, West Bromwich
Sheepwash Nature Reserve, Tipton
Hydes Pool, Woden Road South, Wednesbury
West Smethwick Park, Smethwick
Victoria Park, Tipton.
Fishing Fees and Charges for Sandwell Pools
Type of ticket
Price
Adult Season Ticket
£50
Under 16s / Over 60s Season Ticket
£25
Adult per day (maximum 2 rods)  
£6
Under 16s / Over 60s per day (maximum 2 rods)
£3.50
You can buy fishing season tickets from Sandwell Park Farm, please ask in the shop. Bring a passport size photo so we can issue you with your season ticket.”

A Freedom of information request has revealed that this theory is rather fishy to say the least. I asked

“Please provide information for the last 5 years period 1st April 2012- 1st April 2017.
(I) Number of adult season tickets sold for each year
(ii) Number of under 16s/over 60’s season tickets sold for each year
(iii)Number of adult day tickets sold for each year
(iv) Number of under 16’s/over 60s day tickets sold for each year

Please provide the total revenue earned by the council from fishing between 1st April 2012 -1st April 2017.”

The council answered in a rather messy way, but here are their official figures for each question.

(I) Number of adult season tickets sold for each year

2012 = 1

2013 = 0

2014 = 2 

2015 = 2

2016 = 0

2017 =3
(ii) Number of under 16s/over 60’s season tickets sold for each year

2012 = 0

2013 = 2

2014 = 0

2015 = 0

2016 = 0

2017 = 0
(iii)Number of adult day tickets sold for each year

2012 = 0

2013 = 0

2014 = 0

2015 = 0

2016 = 0

2017 = 0
(iv) Number of under 16’s/over 60s day tickets sold for each year

2012 = 0

2013 = 0

2014 = 0

2015 = 0

2016 = 0

2017 = 2

Please provide the total revenue earned by the council from fishing between 1st April 2012 -1st April 2017.”

The total  revenue is £303.

DISCUSSION.

I think it is fairly obvious to draw some instant conclusions from these figures, these being

  • The council are making next to nothing from this activity, (£303 in five years),and one has to conclude with the costs associated with litter picking by council staff and volunteers and anti -social behaviour, this is not sustainable.
  • Some people have paid a fee to fish, whereas the majority have paid nothing.
  • There appears to be no charge for day ticket fishing (not a single ticket sold in five years!)
  • There cannot be any checks being made by anyone , rangers, street wardens or anyone else to enforce these charges.
  • People are fishing for free in Sandwell , and this appears to be endorsed by the lack of interest by the executive in enforcement procedures.
  • Anti-social behaviour is clearly linked to free fishing, not only nationally, (as expressed to senior EA fisheries officers that I have spoken to at  swan convention meetings ), but in Sandwell as well.
  • Litter is clearly linked to free fishing, and by association tackled birds affected by this.
  • These poor figures, and failure of the angling scheme impact on policy for Sandwell council including sustainability and  crime and disorder implications.

On top of this, where are Sandwell’s Street wardens being deployed when they visit parks? One hears stories of people being fined for their dogs bowel movements by this uniformed praetorian guard, and even famously how they were tasked with the suspect counting of Canada geese by the former parks manager which preceded their abhorrent murder. But why are they not being tasked to earn their money- i.e collecting and enforcing fishing fees (particulalrly day tickets, as well as netting any drinking going on in tents and bivvys?

I will look at the dire impact that Eastern European migration has had to this issue and poaching in a separate blog post. The Environment agency bailiffs appear conspicuous by their absence, despite publishing their rules as described at the link earlier in this post.

Unfortunately Sandwell’s angling policy recommended responsibility for its pools be doled out to “clubs” , yet the professional conduct of such “organisations” was found to be woefully inadequate in some locations , and a poor passing of a poisoned chalice to unprofessional ill equipped amateurs. The council need to take some care in their parks and open spaces.

We have witnessed illegal fishing, criminal damage by cutting down trees to create fishing spaces and drunken anti-social behaviour- as well of as course the ever linked litter with this activity. All of this is an issue of enforcement and stopping those responsible.

There is no economic argument for free fishing in Sandwell’s pools and open spaces to continue- especially when these sites are claimed to be being challenged by Government cuts. We have proven the effects and damage to wildlife and the environment that free fishing causes, and also with this FOI request how some people are unfairly being ripped off where others pay nothing. If someone was to visit a commercial fishery they would have to pay to use the facilities, and for that one could expect that charge to pay for the upkeep of those facilities. The current fees and charges for fishing in Sandwell are not unreasonable, they just need to be collected.

One can only conclude that if free fishing is unsustainably allowed to continue in Sandwell’s parks and open spaces, to their detriment and undesirability,  it can only be a “political decision” made not by the weight of evidence against it, but because it might put some people’s friends out of pocket. That is no way to conduct policy.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Money from nothin and they fish for free

Foxes and geese

Geese have their natural predators- several of them. Goslings are taken by crows, magpies, gulls and herons from the air. But without doubt the biggest enemy comes from the ground attackers.

scan0002

Serial liar and former parks manager John Satchwell makes false claims in 2013

 

Geese have voracious natural predators, who have a far lower mortality rate than the numbers of geese on which they predate.  The birds are watched constantly from the waterside and within the reeds. Adult geese are certainly also vulnerable to being killed, stalked from the shadows as they graze on the bankside. Their predator and mortal enemy – Vulpes vulpes, otherwise known as “the red fox”.

S7910008

Beware the cuteness

Over the years I have been fully aware of the danger posed to wildfowl from the land. Unfortunately they have put pay to several rescues I have attempted of previously injured birds by getting to the bird first, leaving them with no heads. Power line casualties are very often finished off by foxes, removing all trace of the real cause of death. It is also unfortunate that though persecuted themselves, the fox appears to have very much in common with those humans who hunt them in the manner in which they stalk, poach and hunt mercilessly themselves. It is however “nature” that determines both the destiny of the fox and the goose, a necessity and not perverted self gratification.

I recently had an interesting first hand encounter with some foxes that were clearly out to grab a goose or two for dinner. I suddenly heard loud honking which I recognised as the goose distress call- particularly used when the geese spot a predator and are in the presence of their goslings. The mallards on the pool were also quick to usher a collective braying quack. They were not alone on the pool, and they were being watched from the reeds.

08-06-2017_065549

As one fox remained at the bankside, another entered the water where the level was shallow. It is the first time I have seen this, though foxes themselves are very good swimmers, like other domestic dogs.

It was clear that this fox had on its mind the 19 geese in front of it.

08-06-2017_065549(1)

As it got deeper into the water, paying some causal attention to its human watcher, the geese began to coral themselves into a circle, as the chief gander began to defiantly honk away at the intruder.

08-06-2017_065549(2)

Standoff!

This was not a friendly encounter, it was a matter of life and death. Had the geese been at the reed side there would have been a different outcome. The fox then started to lower its body and head, almost like the geese do when in a threatening posture, or to try to hide themselves.

08-06-2017_065549(4)

It was trying to get behind the geese and send them into the reeds, where no doubt the second fox was poised to strike. But the geese stood strong, and it was obvious to the dog that it was not going to get a meal. A strange thing then happened when the fox decided to pick up a stray goose feather in its mouth and then spit it out when retreating back towards the reeds. It is also fair to say that at this point of the year, post moult, that the fox is at a disadvantage given the geese can now fly again. Perhaps prompting the fox into taking a bold attempt at waterside hunting.

08-06-2017_065549(7)

Not by the feather of my goosey goose chin!

But don’t be in any doubt about this voracious predator of geese. Of the 40 plus goslings on this site, currently less than a quarter remain, with 5 adult protectors which would indicate that one adult has also been lost. I have no doubt that the watchers in the reeds take their chances- but that’s natural predation for you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Foxes and geese

Save wildlife from the “garden city”

 

DANGER TO YOU, YOUR HOMES & FUTURE GENERATIONS!

Dubious plans have been announced concerning the development of The Dudley Port area– in effect most of which is not in this area but in Tividale in Sandwell. This local issue is one which will affect the wildlife in this area irrecoverably if more houses are built on the margins  of a designated local nature reserve and canal wildlife corridor.

S7670010

Worse than this, the site of a former tip proposed for more housing in the Temple Way area lies next to a poisonous hazardous waste pool known as “Rattlechain lagoon” which has been responsible for killing dozens of birds through ingestion of white phosphorus- a banned rat poison.

S7660016

S7560001

We will not stand by to see this area destroyed by planners who have little to no knowledge of this area and its wildlife, or the long history of how this area has been polluted by insidious and rotten businesses lining their pockets through avarice.

There comes a tipping point when you have to say NO MORE HOUSING HERE! So called “Brownfield land” is an easy target for developers and people are being conned into believing that such reclamation schemes will bring long term advantages over so called “short term inconveniences”.

The nonsense scheme at Rattlechain is one that has been seen before in the 1990’s which came to little but foundry sand dumping- an unstable and dirty material that blighted people’s homes, and cannot be said to be “safe” to human health when dumped in such large quantities with other materials blowing in the wind.

tipmisery

It brought “misery” for over a decade, and the letter below confirms how the then Black Country Development Corporation road roughshod over people’s concerns and objections in the area.

misery1

misery2

Unfortunately Sandwell council (aka the goose killers), are once again behind these proposals and continue to make a mockery of the concept of “consultation”.

Now 3 weeks into a six week “consultation” they have announced that officers will be available to speak to people about this scheme at an event held at Victoria Park Tipton- the scene of their goose snatching relocation lies, as well as an event that is hosted by The Deputy leader of Sandwell council. Deception appears to be their speciality.

This is over a mile away from Tividale, and so there can be little doubt that this local authority want to see no objections from the people whom it will affect most- IE THE RESIDENTS OF TIVIDALE AND THE TEMPLE WAY ESTATE.

S7760003

What a total CON job!

In the interests of democracy and the protection of the area that it will affect, we are therefore proposing our own consultation event IN THE AREA, where people can learn more about the shocking history of waste disposal in this area, and how the HOPE of nature can recover the scarred landscapes of selfish manmade tipping operations.

We want to see this area left to nature and kept green, not foundry sand black. We want to see the nature reserve at Sheepwash thrive and not become further threatened and marginalised by inappropriate development.

S7690002

Of course people on this estate and the local area are free to bury their heads in the sand and do nothing, but don’t say we didn’t warn you about what you will loose. “Garden Cities” are a PR conjob created by the political and business class to line their scheming pockets.

sandbury

PLEASE OBJECT TO SMBC’S PROPOSALS BY CONTACTING

ldf_planning@sandwell.gov.uk

COME AND JOIN OUR CAMPAIGN TO STOP THE GARDEN CITY AND PROTECT SHEEPWASH LOCAL NATURE RESERVE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA FOR WILDLIFE AND FOR PEOPLE.

Tipton Road Methodist Church 
Saturday 22nd July between 11am -3pm

#SAVEDUDLEYPORT- STOPTHEGARDENCITY

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Save wildlife from the “garden city”

A new bird in town- Avianengers assemble

Gooseman was under pressure, he couldn’t do it all. Fighting crime and political grime and stopping culls had taken their toll, so he decided to go on a vacation and get a nose job. Even Worzel Gummidge and Doctor Who had more than one regeneration.

S7530006

New head

Refreshed and revitalised he approached an old allie- Swanderwoman to help him out at the Go wild Birmingham wildlife festival. He was after all in the vicinity of rogues next to the council house, and he had heard there may be some dodgy characters in the area,  with the event being held this year in Victoria Square.

A stall selling cards and advocating local environmental issues was manned.

S7530004

Don’t even think about it Mr Fox!

S7530003

But it wasn’t long before gooseman wanted a gander at the square, and he had also brought with him a sign.

 

SAM_2060

He hoisted up the sign as high as it would go. Hopefully the bureaucrats and politicians in Birmingham would not be talking abut “being in favour” of culls anytime soon.

But as he mingled for selfies with the crowd, he was about to be upstaged. Enter Swanderwoman from stage door left.

ALAKAZAAM!

SAM_2045

The dynamic duo

Swanderwoman had arrived and the diva began to party centre stage. More Abu Ghraib stationed than BabeStation, this is one Brexit B’yatch ass kicking dame. But she couldn’t give a zig a zig ahhh as she started dancing with some of the locals. Well- those coppers always do it at the carnivals.

S7530052

 

SWAN GIRL POWER!!

 

Shaking that ass

06-10-2017_140541(1)

But who was this “Victoria” bird- surely not one of her idols from the 1990’s!

Autograph hunter

But swanny spice was disappointed when she learnt it was just an old queen that was in the square.

S7530005

SAM_2050

 

After posing for several selfies they met some drummers.

SAM_2065

Before heading for the fluzy in the jacuzzi, minus the water.

SAM_2069

The adventure was soon all over, and after listening to passionate speeches from a variety of animal welfare advocates and campaigners , braving fierce gale force winds and scoffing down a burger from the vegan grindhouse, there was one  last meeting in the square with ironman.

SAM_2056

 

TO BE CONTINUED………?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A new bird in town- Avianengers assemble

Urban Wildlife matters! An alternative election manifesto

11065142_335358206671450_745548785_o - Copy

The chances are people do not vote strongly in large numbers on animal welfare matters to change the outcome of the eventual result, which is why these policies are usually towards the back of party political manifestos. Politicians being politicians however,  calculations are done in whether people in their areas are either for or against issues, and then they do the sums, making brief but often open ended statements before the polls.

Two issues appear to dominate “animal welfare” issues in recent times- namely fox hunting, and more recently the badger cull. MP’s who have their constituencies in predominantly city and town areas largely oppose these two issues, because there are no positive votes likely to be found by supporting them in areas where neither occur. In the West Midlands county for example- The Black country boroughs of Sandwell, Dudley, Wolverhampton and Walsall, Birmingham, and a small part of Coventry- no fox hunting with packs of dogs and people chasing on horseback occurs. There are also no current badger cull zones in any part of this area.

IMGA0559

How safe are urban foxes from being targeted?

These issues are raised frequently because they are human interest stories which are highly politically motivated by divisions of class issue and by divisions of “town” and “Country”. They make good clickbait.

I’m not going to talk any further on these two issues- because quite frankly I’m absolutely sick and tired of them dominating the “animal welfare” agenda, to the point where no other issue is ever raised about animal suffering or “rights.”

Other animals and bird species are “torn to pieces”, other animal and bird species are “cruelly hunted to death”, and other animal and bird species  are “pursued by the unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible.”

Hypocrisy is rife in all this, not just by politicians, but also by many  who claim to support animal welfare/rights. I’m not sure why it matters more if a fox in the countryside is killed by someone rich with a pack of dogs on horseback during daylight hours, any more than being killed by poorer people on foot with dogs during night time hours in an urban setting. My point is the former will be newsworthy, attract large social media attention and comment and all the class based vitriol that is human emotion rather than any care about the animal dying itself. THEY ARE BOTH IMMMORAL, THEY ARE BOTH EQUALLY WRONG!

But in all of this what of the plight of the urban fox, or other creatures cruelly killed by council estate chavs with lurchers and lamps? Why do so few people in urban areas want to protest against his, report this to the authorities, or even lift a finger to stop and sabotage this- on their own doorsteps?

My concerns over the last 20 years and campaigning has been almost exclusively in the urban environment, also including rescue of birds where little media attention of the issues being faced in this urban setting is being addressed by the political class.

I have looked at all of the main party manifestos and their animal policies in the run up to this hastily called general election, and as an urban animal welfare advocate I find little of interest or inspiration that would make me want to vote for any of them based on this. The two species in the same countryside setting appear once again at the fore front, with little else- but why? Why do politicians from urban areas believe that coming out of their constituency holding up a freshly printed sign saying that they are against fox hunting is important to them? What have any of them really done for the welfare of wildlife on their doorstep?

As an alterative manifesto, I offer some crumbs for urban wildlife. Perhaps anyone reading with political clout  may take some of these on board, or dismiss them completely and then down the line regurgitate them as their own ideas. I wouldn’t really mind that if it achieved the objective of getting the urban animal welfare issues discussed- issues that currently receive none.

#1 The return of the angling close season.

The removal of the statutory coarse fish close season on most stillwaters since 1995 and on canals in 2000 has had a negative effect on injuring wildfowl with all year round fishing occurring, where previously a lull between March 16th-June 16th gave nesting birds time to nest and raise young safely.

This gave an opportunity also for vegetation and other bankside wildlife to grow without being trampled. Most local authorities gave up management of fishing at their sites- or doled them out to outfits who were ill equipped to manage problem areas, with free fishing meaning anti social behaviour, angling litter, wildlife problems and poor fish handling. There must be a return to paying to fish on local authority waters and also canals.

A 2002 study Environment Agency study entitled “The impact of lost and discarded fishing line and tackle on mute swans  Research and development technical record W1-051/TR,  Perrins, Martin, Broughton,

highlighted the magnitude of the danger which angling poses for mute swans. Rescue groups and the RSPCA attend over 8,000 swans in trouble each year and it is estimated that approximately 3,000 are due to angling -related incidents, either directly hooked or entangled with fishing tackle.”

 Over 1,000 wild birds were admitted to RSPCA wildlife  centres between 2005 and 2013 as a result of entanglement in  fishing litter. 57 percent (601) of these were swans.

As an active wildfowl rescuer for 20 years I am fully aware at the sharp end of how urban wildlife is continuing to suffer on a daily basis , being needlessly and cruelly killed by this unregulated human recreation activity. So why do MP’s continue to ignore such matters- could it be that criticism is not a vote winner but ignorance is bliss?

IMGA0481

#2 A ban on all forms of lead shot used in angling and shooting

Allied to the point above, lead shot both old and still used continues to poison water birds. It is a myth that all lead shot was banned in 1987. The same study mentioned above found that lead poisoning in the UK accounted for 3.6% of swan rescues over the period 1996-99, though in some “black spot” localised mainly urban  areas, the situation was much higher. The black country is one of these areas. I speak from personal experience on this also.

There have been numerous studies, debates etc, but the general consensus among those in power favours the angling trades association’s protectionism. It is an economic protection issue that neither Labour nor Conservative Governments wanted to tackle- despite clearly being a toxic material being allowed to come into direct contact with the water, and be lost.

The angling associations , previously had a prominent friend in Westminster with Labour’s Martin Salter eventually going on to work for The angling Trust.

The issue with shooting and lead ammunition has also been consistently kicked into touch.

There is no rocket science about allowing a highly known toxic material to enter watercourses. ALL LEAD IN ALL ITS FORMS SHOULD BE BANNED!

#3 Tackling illegal fishing and poaching in urban areas with automatic jail sentences.

Illegal fishing costs both the economy through rod licence evasion and also poses significant risks to urban wildlife and fish. Since 2004 and free movement of people from Eastern Europe the issue has soared, with theft of fish on an industrial scale from still waters and also rivers. I have first hand experience of finding many hand made dangerous fish traps. The one below on a nature reserve was seven foot long and had been put out off an island with rope attached.

IMGA0321

I am not naïve enough to believe that this is all the fault of foreigners, and also that they are unaware of British traditions of returning fish and need educating. The scale of the theft is organised and it is a crime. It needs to be tackled in this way as that issue with automatic sentences. If people continue to engage in these activities, they should be deported.

More local Environment agency backed bailiffs need to be created and directed at urban hot spot areas where it is known to occur.

Local authorities need to enforce local bye laws such as a ban on night fishing and the use of inappropriate tackle.

Poaching also takes the form of killing wildfowl and also some urban dwelling deer. Do not give me any hard luck stories of fake poverty being responsible for this- it is wildlife crime in an urban setting, and as disgusting as some Conservative supporter on horseback hunting down a fox in cold blood. “Little John’s” are not romantic heroes, they are wildlife criminals and they should be jailed when caught poaching.

#4 Dog control orders in designated sites of importance for nature conservation and nature reserves

Dogs not kept under control are killing wildlife in urban areas- but it doesn’t make headlines. Worse still many dog owners refuse to accept that chasing birds into water or even foxes into woodland is a problem. They need to be educated on this but some won’t, which is where dogs on lead by direction orders come in. If they still refuse to control their dogs, they should be fined or even banned from a site.

I believe there could be a requirement to either muzzle or keep dogs on a lead around water courses . This may be controversial but there are no chance of “accidents” occurring that way- and what really is the problem with that in ensuring your dog is protected from others that may attack and bite it?

Dogs should not be allowed to swim in watercourses.

There are some people who are using dogs in urban areas for hunting purposes. I regularly follow them and gather intelligence which is passed on. If vets repeatedly see people turning up to their surgeries with injuries to these animals, they should be legally bound to report suspicions to the RSPCA and police, instead of patching up for profit and ignoring urban wildlife hunting.

H2270034

This swan was left with its leg hanging off after being attacked by an out of control Labrador.

#5 The licensing of air weapons and tougher sentences for misuse

This has been a long standing personal issue to me and one which I will continue to remorselessly hunt down and stalk people back to their homes  who use air weapons in public places, because they are scum.

20111106_165031(3)

02-01-2017_163122(6)

 

Many forms of wildlife are suffering, as well as domestic cats and dogs and there is no such term in English law as “vermin”.

Successive Governments have failed to take control of this issue and even when caught red handed, police fail to take appropriate action other than “advise”. Anyone caught shooting in a public place should loose their weapon and be charged where they clearly commit wildlife crime offences.

02-01-2017_164516

In an example below, a coot was shot by the youth with a woman he was with tossing the dead bird like a toy for her Labrador to play with. He was identified by the police, the bird was taken as evidence by the RSPCA, and between them after 6 months they failed to communicate with one another, both blaming one another in the process. He escaped justice. WHY?- I subsequently learnt that this youth had volunteered significant information about a person of interest- (he had snitched on his mate), who subsequently had his house raided for drugs and weapons and received a prison sentence.

20140331_172700(2)

20140331_173007

 

#6 Stronger bye laws for Local nature reserves and sites of importance for nature conservation.

I have dealt with some of the issues prior to this but would like bye laws implemented at all sites to protect urban wildlife. This would include

#a ban on the flying of drones/model aircraft in these areas

#a ban on the “exercising” of birds of prey (where in reality we all know what is going on there.)

#no barbeques which creates a fire risk to habitat

#no model boats

#no swimming or use of inflatables

#no removal of trees/plants etc

#7 Safer access solutions for urban wildlife

Roads are dangerous places for urban creatures to find themselves on. We all look away when there is a dead animal on the road with sorrow, but roads are being expanded all the time and traffic is becoming impossible to avoid. When these schemes are dreampt up there appear little planning carried out for urban wildlife in how they will adapt to this.

Solutions such as creating tunnels under watercourses separated by roads where road kill is high can be achieved or green bridges such as in The Netherlands.

#8 Stopping developments on so called “brownfield” sites that have become important urban wildlife habitat.

Urban wildlife does not have the same statutory protections that so called “green belt” areas enjoy. It is being systematically weakened by planning laws being relaxed in order to build more houses on so called “brownfield” land. Not only is this dangerous for future human use due to the legacy of pollution on this land, but also the secluded nature of these sites have become havens for urban wildlife and corridors for them to exist. When these go they loose their homes and likely their lives when they are forced onto roads or deemed “pests” to people usurping their habitat.

This needs to change, and the greed of the house building industry and the lies of their so called “environmental consultants, who are nothing more than PR spinners, needs to be put in check. Urban areas can naturally become green and support a variety of urban wildlife. Theses places do not need pretentious names such as “Garden cities” which are merely a window dressed extension of urban sprawl. They just need some basic recognition that they are important and worthy of turning into nature reserves. We need more of these in urban areas.

#9 The repeal of the EU birds and habitats directive article nine which legitimises culls of urban wildlife

 

The Habitats Directive (more formally known as Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora) is a European Union directive adopted in 1992 as an EU response to the Berne Convention. It is one of the EU’s two directives in relation to wildlife and nature conservation, the other being the Birds Directive.

The Green party in particular, who undoubtedly lead on animal welfare issues have called on these EU directives to be secured on Brexit. But here’s what they miss, and why they are wrong about this, and I’m not sure why they want to protect a mechanism that has brought nothing but senseless slaughter to birds not belonging in the new border of Europe- something which birds have been crossing for millennia.

Let’s look at how this ghastly EU legislation, backed up by the likes of Birdlife International (should be Birddeath International) and the RSPB treated the ruddy duck. These avian eugenicists preach about biodiversity, yet do nothing about hunting, which is what the current bird directive protects and facilitates.

“Ruddy Duck Control EU Directive (79/409/EEC) on the Conservation of Wild Birds (Birds Directive) With regards to Ruddy Duck control, Article 11 of the EU Directive (79/409/EEC) on the Conservation of Wild Birds (Birds Directive) states that “Member States shall see that any introduction of species of bird which do not occur naturally in the wild state in the European territory of the Member States does not prejudice the local flora and fauna.”

EU Directive (92/43/EEC) on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) Article 22 (b) of the EU Directive (92/43/EEC) on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) states that “Member States shall ensure that the deliberate introduction into the wild of any species which is not native to their territory is regulated so as not to prejudice natural habitats within their natural range or the wild native flora and fauna and, if they consider it necessary, prohibit such introduction. The results of the assessment undertaken shall be forwarded to the committee for information.”
“Convention on Biological Diversity (Biodiversity Convention) Article 8 (h) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (Biodiversity Convention) states that “each Contracting Party shall, as far as possible and appropriate, prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.”

“Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention) Article 11 (2) (b) of the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention) states that “each Contracting Party undertakes to strictly control the introduction of non-native species.”

“Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) Article III (4c) of the Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) which relates to endangered migratory species states that “parties that are Range States of a migratory species listed in Appendix I shall endeavour to the extent feasible and appropriate, to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endanger the species, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already introduced exotic species.” “

 

You see where I am coming from with this, and it is EU legislation that has proposed culls of grey squirrels amongst others.

Those who support Britain’s membership of the EU, do so in total ignorance as to what it’s directives have done for urban wildlife. I like ruddy ducks, and with over 5000 of them killed in the UK to “protect” a Spanish bird is a sick idea. Ban the hunting and stand up to those greasy Mediterranean murderers.

IMGA0019(1)

A bird should not be killed because of border setting EU bureaucrats and conservationist bigots

#10 An end to urban wildlife culls and the introduction of non lethal methods of site management.

Obviously something at the very heart of our campaign. There are alternatives to culling which are widely available. Animal Aid have produced a report into this.

alternativestoculling

We also looked into this regards geese in Sandwell.

The prejudiced lie

Finally I would like to say that if we forget the common in the towns only favouring that which a very few humans decree should be “conserved” in their interpretation of areas that should be “protected” in the countryside, the next time you go down to an urban oasis for wildlife it may not be there anymore for the many to see. Urban wildlife matters!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Urban Wildlife matters! An alternative election manifesto

The ignorance of Jan Britton

Back in December I delivered a cheque back to Sandwell council house, the one that the chief executive of Sandwell council Jan Britton had sent me, despite The upheld Ombudsman complaint stating that I did not want it.

It appears clear that Britton had not read the Ombudsman report, which is now available on the Ombudsman website.  The key agreed action from this states the following at points

agreed action

“The Council will review how it records its decisions so its reasons are clear.”

As far as I am concerned this refers to how the council records decisions period and not just related to this case, yet it is quite clear to see that no officer in the council along with any councillor has respected the Ombudsman’s agreed action. There has been no review at all, and this is clear to see from looking at the council’s CMIS system. Accordingly I have written to the Ombudsman to report this.

But not only has the chief executive officer of Sandwell council not bothered to investigate how the ludicrous Darren Cooper deceased and his crooked cabinet was running the council without recording any decisions, he has ignorantly failed to even respond to my letter which accompanied his unwanted cheque. This also highlighted how someone from within the corrupt parks department had lied about culling in a freedom of information request.

scan0038

To recap the letter I pointed out

  • how four officers of the council had lied
  • I was sent email of staged pictures which have never been explained as to why geese were being “released”
  • The contractors of the council lied, but are they going to use these liars services again in the future?
  • how the council failed to record any aspect of the divisive decision and without any public consultation. ·         The officer report written by the man in charge of parks at the time appeared to have no recorded genesis as to how it was suggested to be written

    ·         No mention is made of which parks culling should take place in- just a recommendation of “two”

    ·         No mention is made of the fact that these two parks just happened to be the park in which the former parks manager lived, and the other in which his son of the same name found himself a job as “project manager”

    ·         No record of the decision was made at any Council meeting

    ·         No record of any member approving the action in 2013 was taken

    ·         No record of any member approving culling in 2014 was recorded

    So in light of none of this apparently being looked at and following the Ombudsman’s action, it’s obviously  just corrupt business as usual at Sandwell MBC under the same man who was totally blind to all of this as well as apparently everything else going on in the rotten borough. It was recently revealed in The Express and Star that

    “Sandwell Council chief executive Jan Britton was paid £156,942 in 2015-16, slightly down from £157,192 the previous year.”

    JB

    The perfect skills for the job in running Sandwell council

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The ignorance of Jan Britton

BREAKING NEWS- NO BRUM GOOSE CULLS

BN

WORLD EXCLUSIVE

It has today been confirmed officially by Birmingham City Council that there are NO PLANS to cull any Canada geese in any of its parks. A freedom of information request has stated that no birds have been killed by the council in the last five years and there are also no plans to introduce egg pricking of goose eggs either.

birmi1

The response by Val Llewellyn, Professional Support Services Adviser Governance and Compliance and seen by SOSCG also stated

“The Parks Service has a record of all complaints received for the service but not particularly for Canada geese. However, we have checked the records and there were no complaints for Canada geese.

foibirm

birmi2

This response will be hailed by campaigners who were horrified when unsubstantiated claims about “goose attacks” were made by two local councillors at Swanshurst Park in Mosley, which provoked a furious response from local residents and campaigners against culling the birds.

One however should be cautious about the response, and it should be hoped that the council will not be swayed by unfounded speculation in the local press about geese “waging war” or anything else on humans.

S6850032

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on BREAKING NEWS- NO BRUM GOOSE CULLS

Birmingham goose hate councillors are wide of the mark

I suppose we shouldn’t be too surprised that the hatred of one species against another appears to have no borders.

It now appears that two  Birmingham councillors in the south of the city, Habib Ur Rehman and Martin Straker Welds have suggested a potential cull of Canada geese at Swanshurst Park in Moseley. Cllr Rehman claims in newspaper and television reports that he was contacted by people who had had their children “attacked” and “chased” by the geese in the park.

rehman1

Batting for cull- Cllr Rehman

An ITV news camera crew appeared to follow them onto the park, where the alleged  complainant constituents were conspicuous by their absence. It was also apparent in the feature that no geese were attacking anyone during filming, and that in the vox pop in the park asking people of their thoughts, none were in favour of any cull. We have of course been here before in Sandwell with similar “fake news” stories.

news1

Trying to bowl a maiden over: Cllrs Rehman and Welds “feeling positive”

At the same time , Rehman also appears to have hit out at the geese by going to his contacts in Trinity Mirror, where The Sunday Mercury ran a story, which later appeared  online as a Birmingham Mail piece entitled “ALL HELL BREAKS GOOSE”.

Let’s firstly “take a gander” at the Sunday Mercury/Birmingham Mail article, which features Rehman.

Scan_20170220

The offending article from The Sunday Mercury 12/2/17

The claims made about the geese accuse them of “taking over” the park making it “a no -go area”. It goes on to claim that the birds had “taken over almost every inch of the once green space” .

An unnamed resident is given prominent quoted statements as though they are fact such as “I used to take my kids over the park, I couldn’t do it now.”

Councillor Rehman chips in with his own strokes commenting that “the geese are scaring children. I would support a limited cull.”

It appears the two councillors did not bother to brief their officers that they were going to the press, leaving them on a very sticky wicket, as when the newspaper contacted the council for comment they made it clear that “we are not aware of any complaints” . They have thus acted in a rather unprofessional manner by shouting out in the press whilst withdrawing themselves from the field of play, and in leaving parks officers to field the delivery of bouncers by irate animal and bird lovers who have now contacted the council asking for clarification of what is going on.

One might question the legitimacy of their complainant constituents claims, given that it appears that they have not themselves come forward with any direct evidence of children being harmed or anything remotely resembling an “attack” by a goose.

To the contrary there are many very recent public Facebook posts showing young children feeding and interacting with the birds at the park on social media, without showing any fear or incident that “resembles a scene from Hitchcock’s “The Birds” as the paper suggests, and also rubbishing the claims by the faceless “resident”, which shows that the park is very much open and attracts children and families who are not affected by any Canada geese.

sp1

Source Facebook

sp2

Source Facebook

sp3

Source Facebook

Nor does there appear to be much of a talking point, up to the date of broadcast/print run of “the goose attack” in the local Sparkhill neighbourhood community.

rehman3

I do find it both surprising and disappointing that a title such as The Sunday Mercury and Birmingham Mail, which has an unrivalled local investigative approach has chosen to print such an inaccurate and distorted view of hatred, all based it appears on the words of one man and a mystery “local resident”. I say “Disappointed” because I have had past experience of talking to Journalists of the calibre of Tony Larner and Caroline Wheeler who have written accurate and informed articles dealing with animal/wildlife cruelty. This is therefore not usually a “fake news” newspaper.

Mike Lockley is known for his tongue in cheek style which should not be taken too seriously, and I can quite imagine him chortling to himself that two grown men as elected representatives believe that this is the main issue of the day in the area that they represent. But the sub headline is still misleading and inaccurate ; there are not “HUNDREDS of geese” in this park as the online article claims, with the emphasis on the capitalised “HUNDREDS” , and this is picked up and rounded down to “over 100” in the main article. I am also somewhat suspicious of the photograph and the appearance of whole slices of bread which appear to have attracted a group of geese presented in a framed narrow shot which resembles a Liberal Democrat by- election victory. Pan out and you would not see “hundreds” of geese, but a couple of dozen. They are not covering almost every inch of this large open space, which has retained a great deal of greenness, especially as we are still barely out  of Winter.

The opinions expressed by Neil Elkes, the Mail’s political correspondent- comments straight out of the Josef Goebbels school of journalism are a different matter entirely. This is not the first time that this “journalist” has gone on an anti- goose rant in a story, where his own personal opinions and hatred of this species appear to cloud his objectivity in reporting the facts of the case. Note the following choice of diction in this article from 2012, which he weaves into the “story” to present a prejudiced view of this one species. “Canada goose menace” as the headline”. This is anchored by “ANGRY FLOCK” , “mobbed and pecked”, “filthy Canada geese”, “nuisance geese” etc…

I have asked the questions in blue below, which he should have asked, or anyone else would ask if they had an open opinion. But that is not Mr Elkes intention with this one sided piece.

ne1

Though he may be entitled to his personal views, it is clear that his latest “opinion” is not one founded on facts. He claims

“Not only do they strip the grass away and deter other wildlife, but they are a major health hazard. Taking a child for a walk in beauty spots like Swanhurst Park in Springfield, Sutton Park or Sandwell Valley is a huge health risk.”

What “major health hazard” has he identified and what evidence can he produce of a single person ever affected by health issues having come into contact with Canada geese in these three named areas?  What statistics does he have which confirms any correlation between geese being a “major health hazard”, or that they “deter other wildlife”?

He then makes the statement that these parks are unsafe to visit in that in their current state it is “a huge health risk” to do so. This appears to suggest that the two councils do not take human health risks seriously, or that they have not already carried out a risk assessment and found there to be a low health risk associated with the geese. I am not aware for example that these two local authorities have ever felt the need to close these locations to human visitors due to geese “taking over”.

It is apparent that previously Birmingham City Council did have an issue at Sutton Park when they released cows to roam freely in the park. It is quite apparent that the source of infection of E coli in Sutton Park in 2013 came from these unnatural animals and their faeces AND NOT ANY WILD CANADA GEESE.

Farm animals and direct contact with them are a risk to human health, and recently pregnant women were warned not to have any contact with sheep.  

Public Health England guidance on this issue can be found HERE.

S6850020

Elkes’s rant appears a minority view, usually one associated with that of the male drama queen whose own self importance, always expressed through his own offspring’s or grandchild’s apparent hypothetical vulnerability is both self imagined and delusional to the point of insane OCD. Pity a child that will never connect with nature because of his father or mother’s coprophobia or fear of animals or birds that they themselves pass on to their unfortunate creations. Pity the child that believes that every animal is “a health risk” and that killing them is an easy answer. Pity the child that declares “war” on animals because he doesn’t understand them or care about anything other than his own selfish egocentric genes and their survival , and when they in turn go on to procreate, the only thing that matters is the overblown expression of wanting to be seen as a good parent “unspoiled” by nature and “dirty” animals. I pity those children and the adults they will become.

S6830012

A soiled used nappy dumped in Sutton Park

Of course not everyone likes children, and certainly not other peoples. Personally I don’t like them on account of the screeching incoherent noises they make followed by bouts of selfish tantrum squealing when their parents refuse them a demand.  It is not uncommon in “beauty spots” to see parents pulling down their preciouses trousers and pants exposing genitalia and bare buttocks, with the brat routinely encouraged to urinate in the open air with soiled parts showing, and anyone who dares to look on aghast in embarrassment is almost silently accused of being a paedophile for showing disgust. A few years later and we get the obese lardarses evolve into fast food chain guzzling machines scoffing down the freshly served trade waste of back street abortionists dished up in cardboard and polystyrene coffins from the “drive thru”. From their podgy fingers, the garbage is served down the cavernous holes in their rotund faces, and  I’m Not “lovin it” as I stroll through the open space trying to enjoy the peace and quiet of nature, but all I see around me is human greed and gluttony expectorating the body parts of dead animals and birds cooked in batter.

Used nappies are dumped, snotty rags tossed, litter is thrown, half eaten food discarded with packaging…. I could go on about these “huge health risks” but I’m not desperately trying to be a “shock journ” runt of the litter NUJ card holder in the absent guise of George Tyndale.

LOCATION LOCATION

In order to check the voracity of the claims of goose numbers in this park, I have paid a recent visit there, which confirms the numbers of “hundreds” of geese as totally false. A count of  exactly 100 was recorded.

S6850009

The number of geese in the park appears to have also been recently counted by one of the city council’s rangers, which absolutely rubbishes the false numbers reported in the Birmingham Mail article.

KHR

“around 80” and certainly not “HUNDREDS”

Swanshurst Park is a park I am already familiar with, and have been involved in rescuing injured swans there in the past (fishing line). This activity is one which does require frequent attention across many of the Birmingham Parks from wildfowl rescue groups and the RSPCA. It has also previously been reported that the council itself was responsible for a massive fish die off as a result of “inadvertently” leaving open a sluice gate, so lets spare us lectures about water quality and water management please! Maintenance of parks is something that the councillors nor the reporters even appear to raise. On my visit however I saw only clean paths, not covered in any excrement at all. Coloured bulbs are also starting to sprout from the ground.

A solitary attempt at a “no feeding” sign was pinned to a tree, but in truth it didn’t appear as though on a sunny Saturday afternoon that the ground had been covered in bread or chapattis for the birds.

S6850033

Indeed the geese themselves , as I already know from personal experience with this species of over 20 years,  were spending their time minding their own business, not attacking anyone, including the parents with young children that were giving them food.

S6850031

The birds were docile on the grass

S6850032

Having a kip

THREAT

The real news story in Birmingham affecting children under threat is that it is still failing to protect its children in care with its longstanding “inadequate” reputation. The geese are not to blame for this, as they are not to blame for religious extremism in so called “Trojan horse” schools- fuelled by liberal City Council politicians in politically correct denial , child grooming sex gangs, terrorist plots hatched from bedrooms and travel excursions planned to learn violent acts in a rogue state, gun and drug gang violence spilling out of control onto the streets in riot, speeding cars, or even genital mutilation based on insane “religious” or “cultural” practices that are pure and utter backward thinking EVIL.

Perhaps Cllr Rehman and the rest of his colleagues for that matter when he states  “the safety of the children is paramount” in the ITV news clip should be looking at failings within Birmingham’s Governance, its society and in its community before scapegoating one species for damnation.

The geese are not planting IEDs down Wake Green Road in their turds, which can be cleaned up by the City council’s parks department if they so wish, or if the “problem” is even one which warrants it. They are also not shitting in the councils swimming  baths either like children.

The other major factor not linked to this story but one that I am going to and which is relevant is that councillors in this City next year in 2018 face a “limited cull” of their own with the aptly named “boundary commission”,  having reduced their number from the current  120   to 101   in redrawn wards.

The Commission carried out an electoral review of Birmingham City Council following Lord Kerslake’s report on the governance and organisational capabilities of Birmingham City Council. The report recommended that an electoral review be conducted ‘to help the council produce an effective model of representative governance.’ “

In other words there were TOO MANY councillors in Birmingham not doing enough for value for money, and there are currently squatting in the council chamber , more Birmingham councillors than there are Canada geese in Swanshurst park.

Swanshurst Park will now come under the Northern boundary of the new “Billesley” ward according to the redrawn boundary map, where it will now be represented by just  2 councillors.

Is the  partnership of Rehman/Straker Welds I wonder one which is seeking reselection for the newly redrawn particular area? I use cricketing analogies as both men would appear to take more than a passing interest in the local cricket scene, and though there appears no evidence of any birdies having the runs on any of the nearby cricket grounds, it is something which crossed my mind, especially seeing Councillor Rehman’s declared members interests in the Warwickshire County Cricket Club as chair of the “Safety advisory group” of that club, expressed somewhat cryptically in his declaration of members interest .

I am not alleging any wrongdoing on the part of the good councillor Rehman, and nor am I suggesting that he is a complete tosser either, but I would however like to draw the readers attention to his links, just in case we suddenly see a flurry of false appeals from white jumpered enthusiasts trying to get the geese OUT.

rehman4

rehman5

rehman6

 

It appears from the source below that he was almost run out himself in 2014, though must have just scrapped home on a TV replay and politically has been linked to “stirring the pot” with “rumours” before whilst at the crease, according to another NeilElkes/Birmingham Post story from 2013. .

rehman2

CAMPAIGN

A campaign has been started to “SAVE THE SWANSHURST CANADA GEESE” on facebook, with a petition that can also be signed and which will be presented to the City Council in due course.

I would  like to state that I did not start this campaign or petition, and I am not running it either, but have given some sage advice to the very able wildlife campaigners who live in the area close to the park based on the Sandwell experience. We will of course support their objectives to save the geese and hope that Birmingham City council do not go down the line of Sandwell in culling geese based on half truths and out right lies.

I would also like to emphasise that I am not a member of any political party, I just ask questions which some people would like to avoid answering. I am somewhat confused however by Labour’s policy on wildlife and culls, and on this point I am writing to Deputy Leader Tom Watson MP to perhaps provide some unambiguous clarity on how his party can “reconnect” with the electorate. Labour style themselves as “The Party of Animal Welfare”, though when I contacted the Labour Animal Welfare Society (LAWS) about the goose cull in Sandwell and asked what they made of it, I did not get as much as the courtesy of a response.

Their charter for animals which was sent to local authorities makes interesting reading concerning wildlife.

Here are a few interesting statements made within this charter

“Wildlife

1) This Council believes that the rich variety of wildlife in its area is an important treasure to be protected and safeguarded. Wild animals have the capacity to suffer stress and pain through direct abuse and through direct and indirect stress placed upon them by the destruction, reduction and pollution of their food and water sources and habitats.

14) The Council will consult with local residents and groups who have considerable local knowledge, experience and expertise in the welfare and study of wild animals to assist in the formation of strategies and action plans to support wildlife in the area.

16) Management of the Council’s parks, gardens and open spaces will be modified where possible to give greater priority to ecological considerations, and uncontrolled public access will be excluded from the most sensitive areas/habitats.”

It is quite clear that when it comes to Animal Rights, there does appear to be a hierarchy of animals which are worth “saving” more to some people. Geese come much further down the league table than badgers, though are somewhat higher than grey squirrels, pigeons and rats.

I do believe that those claiming anything about “animal welfare” , including its protection should put party politics second and not first.

I am not one of those who shouts “CULL THE TORIES” as though they are to blame for everything , as it is quite plain for anyone to research that though the likes of Labour’s Tony Benn and Tony Banks made great strides for animal welfare in Parliament , there are the likes of Kate “Tally” Hoey MP who do much to kick it back. I can also appreciate that there have been some MP’s like Ann Widdecombe of the Conservatives who have and continue to speak out and up for animals nationally through their status. Anyone who tells you that there is only one evil party and Labour are somehow “the good guys” are leading you up a political garden path, as this is total crap based on the available evidence. There appears to be little difference, and you really can never trust politicians.

In Sandwell and now Birmingham, we see Labour Councillors acting as though they are God and proposing or enacting culls on the basis of spurious claims-against their own “animal welfare” campaign groups charter- just it seems as the current Conservative Government has done with Bovine TB and badger slaying. Sandwell of course infamously lied and DID NOT prick goose eggs as was claimed by one cabinet member who lied on BBC Radio WM about this.

MSW1

When Cllr Welds talks of “relocating” and pricking eggs “as they do at the Sandwell Valley”, he speaks with little wisdom or knowledge on the subject, despite on his declaration CV being somehow connected with The RSPB- an elitist bird hierarchy organisation linked with supporting mass extermination of species like the ruddy duck amongst others, whilst championing the rare, and denouncing the common. Though he appears a reasonable man open to suggestion on camera, getting the media involved and making this a public issue before really thinking about it carefully wasn’t the smartest move on his part.

MSW2

Birmingham City Council (under Labour control), acted in partnership with the murderous FERA marksmen at Witton Lakes in 2013 to kill 7 ruddy ducks, as revealed IN THIS FOI REQUEST.

THEY DID NOT HAVE TO GIVE LANDOWNER CONSENT AT THIS TIME.

murderers

It was the disgraced tax payer thief Labour’s Elliot Morley (ex MP) who enacted the Conservatives plans for this inhumane slaughter of the UK’s entire population of this species.

I could ask from all of this what is Labour’s problem with wildfowl, and why does it bang the drum for cuddly hedgehogs, badgers and foxes- seen to be a Tory hunting pastime, yet in clandestine hypocritical fashion carry out and facilitate wildlife culls and hope that it does not get noticed ?  Do they believe that birds feel no pain?

What one can clearly see with direct evidence is an attack on a goose in this very park a couple of months ago where a crossbow bolt was fired through its head  at close range. The RSPCA rescued this bird, in an incident which is sadly becoming quite common across the West Midlands and beyond towards wildfowl.

goosebow

What kind of creature would do this?

It could be said to be a “species hate crime” in fact. But on this occasion, there appeared to be no words of condemnation from the local elected representatives of this area that some deranged maniac had armed themselves with a weapon to inflict harm on a defenceless bird. Perhaps this speaks volumes as to what their priorities are. One can only hope that there is a change of heart by the two councillors, that the news stories were “sexed up” and sensationalised, and that they are open to discussions in accepting non lethal methods of site management, and that there is never any merit in culling wildlife.

Culling could mean that they themselves are out for a duck.

S6850026

fairies

HOWZAT ? “cricket fairies”

S6850030

Ur OUT

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Birmingham goose hate councillors are wide of the mark

DISPATCH THE FAECES, NOT THE SPECIES

DISPATCH THE FAECES

turd4

turd3

NOT THE SPECIES!

turd5

turd6

CULL TURDS , NOT BIRDS!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DISPATCH THE FAECES, NOT THE SPECIES

They do kill birds for profit

Back in September after a tip off, the pest control company who lied about killing geese in Sandwell were seen in the Sandwell Valley.

s6030003

Egg pricking at this time of the year  would obviously not have been on the agenda, so what were they doing there? We decided to ask Sandwell council a Freedom of Information Request for egg pricking and nest figures for 2016, which would give a four year period of records. It was also decided to ask for more detail about the methods being used to control numbers. Additionally we also asked what other species this company may be being used to destroy on behalf of the council.

WHAT DID WE ASK.

1)      In 2016 how many Canada goose nests were identified and at which Sandwell sites were these nests located? 

 

Sandwell Sites Number of Nests

Priory Woods LNR 12

Forge Mill Lake North Island 9

Swan Pool 4

Sheepwash 6

Dartmouth Park, West Bromwich 6

Hydes Road, Wednesbury 0

Smethwick Hall, Smethwick 1

Victoria Park Tipton 4

Victoria Park Smethwick 2

West Smethwick Park 1

Red House Park 1

TOTAL = 62

2)      In 2016 how many Canada goose eggs were pricked and at which sites did this take place? 

 

Egg Pricking at Sandwell Sites Number of Eggs

Priory Woods LNR 86

Forge Mill Lake North Island 54

Swan Pool 20

Sheepwash 29

TOTAL = 189

3)      In 2016 how many Canada goose eggs were oiled and left in the nests, and at which sites did this take place?

 

Oiling at Sandwell Sites Number of Eggs

Dartmouth Park, West Bromwich 31

Hydes Road, Wednesbury 0

Smethwick Hall, Smethwick 4

Victoria Park Tipton 27

Victoria Park Smethwick 9

West Smethwick Park 5

Red House Park 4

TOTAL=80

TOTAL OF ALL EGGS = 269

4)      In 2016 how many Canada goose eggs were removed from nests and at which sites did this take place?

No eggs were removed from any nests.

 

5)      Since 2013 has Pestex been hired by Sandwell Council to carry out any services other than the control of Canada goose numbers?  If so, what were the other services that Pestex carried out during this time period?  Please state all the species that Pestex were hired to deal with throughout this time period, and please specify which methods were used by Pestex to control the numbers of those species. 

 

Rats & Mice – Routine Pest control visits to Inspect and remove Rodent Infestations by means of Rodenticide Bait – Approved Traps and Pest Proofing, to meet British Pest Control Association ( BPCA ) Guidelines and CRRU Stewardship.

Ants – Insecticidal Spray treatment to Infested area with an approved and Suitable Insecticide.

Wasp Nests – Treatment made with and approved and suitable Insecticide or Dusting Powder.

Flies – Supply and Fit Cobra or Viper Insect control unit to area to remove and keep clear. Supply and Fit Fly Screens to windows or doors to prevent Insect access.

Feral Pigeon – Controlled via Proofing works by means of the Supply and Fit of Pigeon Netting or Anti Pigeon Spike where achievable and suitable.

Carry Out a Controlled Pigeon Cull by means of two fully Trained Air Rifle Marksmen to dispatch and remove.

Feral Cat – Removal of feral cat via approved live trapping, vet checked for ID Tag, Health Check, Sterilisation and Re-homed.

Kind regards

Matt Darby

Operational Manager – Parks and Countryside – Neighbourhoods

 

Discussion

Goose nest and egg numbers.

We learn that in addition to the other formal park sites previously visited by this company that they have in this year included Sheepwash Nature Reserve, and Priory woods Local Nature Reserve, as well as visiting Forge Mill Lake for a second year in a row and where they infamously “released” geese in 2013. This in itself produces questions as to whether this should be happening, given that there are many natural predators  at these sites, including the much lauded ” Sandwell Valley Heronry” to which the eggs and goslings are a source of food, and which through their loss could impact on other more “desirable” species that the council purport to support.

Of course the total idiotic mind set of conservationists proposes that it is the geese who are discouraging other more “desirable” species from nesting- though they can offer no direct evidence whatsoever to support this in the form of loss of numbers of other species and a direct correlation that the geese have caused this reduction. It does sound good however to come out with such statements without giving any evidence.

If some bloke decides to set foot in a canoe on an island where several species are nesting side by side, one can only hope that these “desirable” species do not find their nests trampled or the birds permanently scared off.

The figures supplied by SMBC for 2016 as well as the previous 3 years should be taken with caution given that they have been supplied by the company who also lied about their presence at Victoria Park. The figures for 2015 were also skewed by including Forge Mill Lake in the egg treatment, part of which could probably be said to be in Birmingham.

We will look first at the figures between 2015 and 2016, which appear to show a general decrease in both nesting Canada geese and eggs produced at most sites. Overall even with the inclusion of the two new sites, the number of eggs treated by this company fell from 281 in 2015 to 269 in 2016. This of course assumes the company are able to tell the difference between an abandoned egg from the previous year and a freshly laid one, (something which we very much doubt).

The number of eggs per nest at Priory woods appears a little high >7 per nest, and we would suggest that it is highly likely that eggs identified would be from previous years.

IT SHOULD BE NOTED AS BEFORE THAT NOT ALL OF THESE EGGS WOULD HAVE NATURALLY HATCHED AND IF THESE EGGS HAD HATCHED THE NUMBERS OF GOSLINGS WOULD STILL HAVE BEEN FURTHER REDUCED THROUGH NATURAL PREDATION.

SITE NUMBER OF NESTS 2015                 TOTAL EGGS TREATED 2015                NUMBER OF NESTS 2016                      TOTAL EGGS TREATED 2016
DARTMOUTH PARK- WEST BROMWICH 9 51 6                               31
HYDES ROAD-WEDNESBURY 1 5 0                             0
REDHOUSE PARK- WEST BROMWICH 1 5 1 4
SMETHWICK HALL-SMETHWICK 1 4 1                              4
VICTORIA PARK -TIPTON 6 34 4                          27
VICTORIA PARK SMETHWICK 2 12 1                             9
 WEST SMETHWICK PARK 2 8 1                               5
 FORGE MILL LAKE WEST BROMWICH 22 144 9                           54
SWAN POOL WEST BROMWICH 4 18 4 20
SHEEPWASH NATURE RESERVE N/A N/A 6 29
PRIORY WOODS LNR N/A N/A 12  

86

                                             TOTALS

 

 

48 281 62  

269

Methods.

Distinction appears to be made between pricking eggs at the nature reserve sites and oiling eggs at the formal parks, with no eggs being removed to be destroyed from the nest. There is no reason given as to why this should be the case.

Killing other species.

We now know through this request and another recently asked that Sandwell council appear to employ Pestex for their services in the Sandwell Valley area, rather than using their own staff who presumably could control Rats and mice, ants, wasps, flies and “feral cats” as qualified “pest controllers” in the same manner as they do in the formal parks or anywhere else in the borough. The question is why do SMBC employ this company presumably at a far higher rate within Sandwell Valley? We have asked this question of The chief executive of Sandwell Jan Britton.

It seems a little bizarre that SMBC would want to remove a cat from a site where they also report “rat and mice infestations” , but this is a site where they play at farming in any case.

By far the most sinister and revealing aspect of this request was the unexpected

“Carry Out a Controlled Pigeon Cull by means of two fully Trained Air Rifle Marksmen to dispatch and remove.”

The location of this is not revealed, though it is assumed The Sandwell Valley. This also once again exposes the liars Pestex who stated “we don’t kill birds mate” when I asked them about what they were doing in Victoria Park when I caught them rounding up geese.

We are aware that they were used to put up “pigeon deterents” at Lichfield Cathedral last year, but it was conveniently not revealed on the BBC Midlands Today news item if the company had prior to that shot any pigeons that they found there first!

s2060006

Pestex director Gary Cook

There are of course non-lethal methods available for controlling all of the above without killing, but that is not something which SMBC or certainly not Pestex would ever understand.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on They do kill birds for profit